$214M
Orby AI acquisition value — as founding designer
$3M
Revenue growth driven at Armorblox
15+
B2B SaaS products shipped to market
90
Days to first major delivery
The Real Problem

They wake up thinking about existential business risk. That's what I actually solve.

"We're losing enterprise deals to better-designed and AI-native competitors."
"Our product feels fragmented. Users drop off before the value moment."
"We ship features but not adoption. The roadmap keeps growing, results don't."
That's what I actually fix.
Point of View

Why most AI products fail
enterprise adoption.

Executives hire thinkers. The site shouldn't just say "I am experienced" — it should say "I see the future before others do." Here's how I think about it.

01 / THE CAPABILITY-ADOPTION GAP
AI can do it. Users won't trust it.

Most AI products are built to demonstrate capability, not to earn trust. The UX operating model has to shift from "feature showcase" to "confidence architecture" — every interaction has to reduce uncertainty, not increase it. That's a fundamental design leadership problem, not an engineering one.

02 / ORGANIZATION EATS STRATEGY
Your product is only as coherent as your org chart.

Fragmented products are almost always a symptom of fragmented teams. When PM, design, and engineering aren't aligned at the leadership level, the product shows it. The fix isn't a design sprint — it's organizational clarity. I fix both simultaneously because you can't solve one without the other.

03 / THE NEW UX OPERATING MODEL
AI products need a new design grammar.

The old UX playbook — user flows, wireframes, usability tests — still applies, but it's not enough. AI-native products require designing for ambiguity, failure modes, and trust recovery. Most design teams haven't updated their methods. That gap is where enterprise deals are won and lost.

How We Work Together
Transformation Paths

Three ways to engage.
All designed to move fast.

Not pixel polish. Not production outsourcing. Strategic transformation with executive accountability and measurable outcomes.

Path 01
AI Product & Design Transformation

Your embedded strategic operator. I function at the CPO/CDO level — setting product strategy, aligning your organization, and representing design at the executive table. This is not design management. This is organizational transformation.

  • AI product strategy & roadmap ownership
  • PM / Design / Engineering alignment at leadership level
  • Design org building, hiring & culture
  • Executive reporting — board-ready, no jargon
Path 02
Product Experience Audit & Strategy

An outside executive eye on your product with a bias toward revenue and enterprise adoption. I find where your product is losing deals, losing trust, and losing users — then hand you a roadmap your entire team can execute against.

  • Enterprise UX audit — conversion blockers, trust gaps, adoption friction
  • AI workflow & trust architecture review
  • Competitive positioning through experience lens
  • Prioritized transformation roadmap
Path 03
0 → Enterprise Product Design

Full ownership of the product experience layer — from zero to launch or from v1 to enterprise-grade. I bring the research, the design system, the team alignment, and the engineering handoff. You ship. Users trust it. Enterprise buyers close.

  • User research & AI trust model design
  • End-to-end product design & prototyping
  • Design system & component governance
  • Engineering-ready handoff & QA partnership
The Fit Question

Who I work best with.

High-end operators are selective. I work with companies where design can genuinely change the business outcome. If that's not the context, I'll tell you directly.

Best Fit ✓
  • Seed to Series C AI-native startups
  • B2B SaaS teams adopting AI agents to uplevel customer experience
  • Founders transitioning from founder-led design
  • Companies who believe in design-led product-market-fit
  • Organizations where product experience is a strategic differentiator
Not a Fit ✗
  • You believe PMs can replace designers to do design to save cost
  • Pixel-polish-only or production outsourcing requests
  • Short-term task execution without strategic ownership
  • Companies without product ownership clarity
  • Teams that don't involve design in business decisions or customer conversations
Diagnose Your Situation

Which describes you right now?

01
I need strategic leadership, not just a designer.

Scaling fast and need someone who can run the function at the executive level.

Path 01 — AI Transformation →
02
My product isn't converting. Enterprise buyers aren't trusting it.

Need an outside expert to find the friction and hand you a roadmap.

Path 02 — Product Audit →
03
I need to design and ship a new product — fast.

Full ownership of the product experience from zero to enterprise-grade.

Path 03 — 0→Enterprise →
Client Results

Proof, not promises.

Sophisticated buyers want causal proof. Here's what changed, why it changed, and what it meant for the business.

The Engagement Model
No ramp-up theater.

What you get
in 90 days.

No endless discovery. No consultant theater. Real work, real velocity, real outcomes.

01
Days 1–30: Diagnosis & Direction
  • Product audit — UX gaps, trust failures, conversion blockers
  • Stakeholder alignment session with executive team
  • Prioritized transformation roadmap engineering can act on immediately
  • First design artifacts delivered in week 2
02
Days 31–60: Build & Ship
  • Core product flows designed, prototyped, and validated with users
  • Design system foundations or expansion
  • Weekly 1-page executive brief — board-ready, no jargon
  • Engineering-ready handoff specs
03
Days 61–90: Measure & Scale
  • Adoption metrics review with actionable insights
  • Iteration cycles on shipped features
  • Hiring brief if you're building a design function
  • Recommendation for ongoing advisory or full engagement

Currently taking on 2 new client engagements.

Typical waitlist: 2–4 weeks.

Your AI product deserves strategic design leadership

Ready to accelerate
organizational transformation?